Electowiki talk:Policy: Difference between revisions
→Advocacy article templates: respond to User:RobLa
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Using Electowiki to vet new concepts: respond to User:RobLa) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Advocacy article templates: respond to User:RobLa) |
||
Line 127:
:"''...only allowed by people who consider themselves...''" <- that seems really difficult to patrol. Perhaps we should ask everyone to first indicate that they are a "PLACE proponent" (or "____ proponent", or whatever group they are a member of, as appropriate) someplace. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 22:39, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
:: "that seems really difficult to patrol" I think it would be pretty obvious if someone is trying to sabotage an advocacy page. I think the policy would be more like "permission to revert at will" anything added by people who aren't contributing positively. Indicating their "allegiance" someplace could be good too. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 05:03, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
== Criterion compliances and election method template ==
| |||