Electowiki talk:Policy: Difference between revisions
→Criterion compliances and election method template: respond to User:Kristomun
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Advocacy article templates: respond to User:RobLa) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 141:
: One other thought: this seems like it would be a perfect task for Wikidata since Wikidata is designed for this. As an example, I just added a claim that Copeland's method complies with the monotonicity criterion to the Wikidata page for Copeland's method: ([[d:Q5168347|Wikidata Q5168347]]). The Wikidata item for a Wikipedia article can be found on almost every Wikipedia article; in the left navigation column, under "Tools", there's a "Wikidata item" link. I did not yet add a citation for Cppeland's monotonicity, but Wikidata is designed to allow for citations on relationships (and encourages them).
: By itself, that doesn't solve the problem for Electowiki, but we already have links between Electowiki articles and their English Wikipedia counterparts. We could start creating more direct links between Electowiki articles and their Wikidata counterparts. Thoughts? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 20:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
: Yes, that's a great idea, and Wikidata seems to have this functionality already. I'm not sure how the technical side works, but I think we can install Wikibase here and have our "own Wikidata" that can still "transclude" info from the main Wikidata? We were [[User_talk:Psephomancy#Criterion_compliance_logic|talking about it on my talk page]]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 05:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||