Electowiki talk:The caucus: Difference between revisions
→Categories: Should we put voting methods in all parent categories as well?
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→StructuredDiscussions: respond to User:RobLa) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→Categories: Should we put voting methods in all parent categories as well?) |
||
Line 274:
::::: This should help with categorization. Can you put one together hopefully we can come up with a format that would work for all multimember systems. Ill populate the pages if you can make one like the one I made above. --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 22:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
So I was thinking about this, and I'm wondering if we should change our policy so that voting methods go in *all* categories that apply to them, even if they are also in a sub-category of that category.
It's not always obvious which parent categories apply to a given voting method, and it would allow you to see all Condorcet methods on one page, for instance, without navigating into the the drop-downs for "Condorcet-reducible PR methods", "Sequential comparison Condorcet methods" etc. It would also allow the above DPL lists to work without needing to include sub-categories (which can only nest 2 deep anyway). Does this seem like a good idea to anyone else? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 01:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||