Favourability voting: Difference between revisions

Favourability Voting is a cardinal voting method based on both score voting and approval voting in which voters numerically score each candidate and/or party on both of two separately divided scales: for approval (numbers from 0.00 to 100.00) and disapproval (numbers from 0.00 to -100.00). For example, in the more simple version, Noncomparative Favourability Voting, someone can simultaneously express +57.80% approval and -45.70% disapproval (for a net approvalfavourability of +12.10%) at the same time for any single candidate or party they wish. These two do not ever need to add up to each other. The positive percentages are then subtracted by the negative percentages to reach an election outcome, and whoever wins the highest sum (net approval) is selected. Pairwise Favourability Voting is even more intricate as this is where you freely measure how much you approve and disapprove of each candidate and/or party not just only individually but also in every single last possible one-on-one matchup there is. This is done and treated as wholly independent of each other and matchups such as A vs. B and B vs. A once again do not have to add up to 100 since they are not tied to each other (i.e. one might rate A in disapproval as -33.10% against B but B -66.80% against A). As you can see, each cell is treated as a different scale from each other and thus intransitive (circular preference) results in matchups (such as A > B > C > A) are fully allowed as the calculation process, which is different from other pairwise methods in that an overall score for each candidate is derived from the summation of their personal score and matchup scores together, and as such manages to bypass Condorcet's paradox. Scientists have determined that circles of preference are a natural occurrence in humans and this is in fact how many of our thought processes play out.