Favourability voting: Difference between revisions
This is an unfinished section for outcomes. I will get back to completing the ballots and also elaborating on each outcome later.
(+ Corrections (August 25 -> August 27), personalization (User:DewyWind -> me), attribution of magical inspiration to my brilliant first cousin for this great idea!) |
(This is an unfinished section for outcomes. I will get back to completing the ballots and also elaborating on each outcome later.) |
||
Line 72:
This way, technically speaking voters do not have to open any more "windows" within this than they would with regular score voting, while also at the same time having the opportunity to express more deeply their preference and opinion.
=Outcomes=
{| class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" border=""
|- align="center"
| colspan="2" rowspan="2" |'''Approval'''
! colspan="6" |against
|- align="center"
! class="against" |Erin
! class="against" |Martin
! class="against" |Casey
! class="against" |Riley
! class="against" |Anna
!Devin
|- align="center"
! rowspan="6" |for
! class="for" |Erin
| bgcolor="yellow" | +58.65
| class="loss" | +47.93
| bgcolor="yellow" | +52.71
| class="loss" | +36.37
| bgcolor="yellow" | +64.55
|
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Martin
| bgcolor="yellow" | +51.73
| bgcolor="yellow" | +55.28
| bgcolor="yellow" | +60.73
| class="loss" | +45.40
| bgcolor="yellow" | +33.65
|
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Casey
| class="loss" | +57.13
| class="loss" | +46.45
| bgcolor="yellow" | +45.97
| class="loss" | +72.63
| class="loss" | +66.37
|
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Riley
| bgcolor="yellow" | +48.91
| bgcolor="yellow" | +51.01
| bgcolor="yellow" | +52.73
| bgcolor="yellow" | +53.44
| class="loss" | +49.47
|
|- align="center"
! class="for" | Anna
| class="loss" | +33.47
| class="loss" | +34.34
| bgcolor="yellow" | +59.62
| bgcolor="yellow" | +77.20
| bgcolor="yellow" | +68.50
|
|-
!Devin
| +18.92
| +25.69
| +37.30
| +89.45
| +11.40
| +7.64
|}
{| class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" border=""
|- align="center"
| colspan="2" rowspan="2" |'''Disapproval'''
! colspan="6" |against
|- align="center"
! class="against" |Erin
! class="against" |Martin
! class="against" |Casey
! class="against" |Riley
! class="against" |Anna
!Devin
|- align="center"
! rowspan="6" |for
! class="for" |Erin
| bgcolor="yellow" | -49.40
| class="loss" | -35.62
| bgcolor="yellow" | -37.80
| class="loss" | -70.80
| bgcolor="yellow" | -37.41
| -45.72
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Martin
| bgcolor="yellow" | -44.55
| bgcolor="yellow" | -55.55
| bgcolor="yellow" | -60.57
| class="loss" | -39.75
| bgcolor="yellow" | -42.40
| -35.40
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Casey
| class="loss" | -51.13
| class="loss" | -43.40
| bgcolor="yellow" | -57.66
| class="loss" | -45.70
| class="loss" | -32.74
| -87.20
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Riley
| bgcolor="yellow" | -65.89
| bgcolor="yellow" | -61.13
| bgcolor="yellow" | -36.44
| bgcolor="yellow" | -26.80
| class="loss" | -17.83
| -90.62
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Anna
| class="loss" | -33.51
| class="loss" | -50.22
| bgcolor="yellow" | -40.40
| bgcolor="yellow" | -38.45
| bgcolor="yellow" | -41.80
|
|-
!Devin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
<table class="sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" border="" cellpadding="3"><caption></caption><tr align="center"><td colspan="2" rowspan="2">Results </td><th colspan="5">against </th></tr>
<tr align="center">
<td class="against"> <span class="cand">Erin</span></td>
<td class="against">Martin</td>
<td class="against">Casey </td>
<td class="against">Riley</td>
<td class="against">Anna</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<th rowspan="5"> for</th>
<td class="for"> <span class="cand">Erin</span></td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">708</td>
<td class="loss">410</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 461 </td>
<td class="loss">298</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">610</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td class="for"> Martin</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 511 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">645</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 461 </td>
<td class="loss"> 458 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">485 </td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td class="for">Casey </td>
<td class="loss"> 460</td>
<td class="loss"> 460 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">460</td>
<td class="loss"> 460</td>
<td class="loss"> 460</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td class="for">Riley</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">623 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 463</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 461</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">440</td>
<td class="loss">312</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td class="for">Anna</td>
<td class="loss">311</td>
<td class="loss">436 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 461 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 609</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 311</td>
</tr>
</table>
=Rationale=
Favourability Voting encompasses all types of different possibilities, whereas with even the most detailed of other alternative voting systems, much of these are ignored. Let’s give an example of a single-winner election. Whereas in regular score voting, a voter who scores a candidate or party 50% could be interpreted as being three entirely different kinds of voters:
*
*
*
So, as you can probably see, these are pretty clearly three different feelings from each other which essentially have little to absolutely nothing in common. Pairwise Favourability Voting, unlike many other systems, is able to understand this and captures these three unique opinions separately: the one who both loves and hates an entity ("love-hate relationship/frenemies") would give it 100% on both approval and disapproval, and those who like half of something but dislike the rest of it ("meh/so-so") go +50% approval and -50% disapproval, whereas an indifferent participant ("whatever/I don't care") would put 0% on both approval and disapproval, and they can also be able to freely express different levels of these conflicting feelings when regarding comparisons, this level of expression allows for a better, more truthful way to sort out our preferences and for providing detailed statistical analysis.
| |||