electowiki

Favourability voting: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Favourability voting (view source)

Revision as of 08:19, 8 September 2021

636 bytes added ,  2 years ago
→‎Outcomes: — To be continued.
VisualWikitext
(I'll return soon in order to finish this off.)
(→‎Outcomes: — To be continued.)
Line 48:
| A || '''–33.58'''||–64.40||–51.69||–149.67
|-
|B|| '''–41.40'''||–57.51||–55.80 ||–154.71
–154.71
|-
| C||–36.80|| –45.20||–66.32||'''–148.32'''
Line 63 ⟶ 62:
!Sum
|-
| A||+32.02||–31.60||–7.25||–6.83
|-
|B||+18.22 ||+3.29||–21.46||+0.05
|-
|C||+5.60 ||+9.14||+2.34||'''+17.19'''
|}
 
Line 79 ⟶ 78:
 
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" cellpadding="3" border=""
|+Erin wins in approval with a sum of +388.63.
|- align="center"
| colspan="2" rowspan="2" |'''Approval'''
! colspan="6" |against
! rowspan="2" | Sum
|- align="center"
! class="against" | Erin
! class="against" |Martin
! class="against" |Casey
Line 94:
! rowspan="6" |for
! class="for" |Erin
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+86.66'''
'''+86.66'''
| class="loss" | +47.93
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+92.70'''
| class="loss" |'''+66.32'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+58.65'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+36.37'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+388.63'''
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Martin
| bgcolor="yellow" | '''+51.73'''
| bgcolor="yellow" | +55.44
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+60.73'''
| class="loss" | +45.40
| bgcolor="yellow" | +33.65
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+54.07'''
| +283.32
|- align="center"
Line 118 ⟶ 117:
| class="loss" |'''+72.63'''
| class="loss" |'''+66.37'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+50.35'''
| +338.90
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Riley
| bgcolor="yellow" | +48.91
| bgcolor="yellow" | '''+51.04'''
| bgcolor="yellow" | +52.73
| bgcolor="yellow" | +53.44
Line 139 ⟶ 138:
| +344.42
|-
!Devin
| class="loss" | +18.93
| class="loss" | +25.69
| class="loss" | +37.30
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''+90.64'''
| class="loss" | +11.40
| class="loss" | +26.60
| class="loss" | +210.56
|}
 
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" cellpadding="3" border=""
|+Devin wins in disapproval with a sum of -123.74.
|- align="center"
| colspan="2" rowspan="2" |'''Disapproval'''
! colspan="6" |against
! rowspan="2" |Sum
|- align="center"
! class="against" | Erin
 
! class="against" | Martin
! class="against" |Casey
! class="against" |Riley
! class="against" | Anna
! class="against" |Devin
|- align="center"
! rowspan="6" |for
! class="for" |Erin
| bgcolorclass="yellowloss" | -49–49.40
| classbgcolor="lossyellow" |'''-35–35.6222'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-37–37.80'''
| class="loss" | -70–70.80
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-37–36.4174'''
| -45class="loss" |–45.72
<td| class="loss"> 460</td>|–275.68▼
| -276.75
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Martin
| bgcolorclass="yellowloss" | -44–44.55
| bgcolorclass="yellowloss" | -55–55.55
| bgcolor="yellow" | -60–60.57
| classbgcolor="lossyellow" |'''-39–39.75'''
| bgcolor="yellow" | -42–42.40
| -35class="loss" |–35.40
| class="loss" |–278.22
| -278.22
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Casey
| class="loss" | -51–51.13
| classbgcolor="lossyellow" |'''-43–43.40'''
| bgcolorclass="yellowloss" | -57–57.66
| class="loss" | -45–45.70
| class="loss" | -32–32.74
| -87class="loss" |–87.20
| class="loss" |–317.49
| -317.49
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Riley
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-65–65.89'''
| bgcolorclass="yellowloss" | -61–61.13
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-36–36.44'''
| bgcolorclass="yellowloss" | -26–26.80
| class="loss" |'''-17–17.83'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''–29.34'''
| -29.34
| class="loss" | –237.43
| -237.43
|- align="center"
! class="for" |Anna
| class="loss" | -33–33.51
| class="loss" | -50–50.22
| bgcolor="yellow" | -40–40.40
| bgcolor="yellow" | -38–38.45
| bgcolorclass="yellowloss" | -41–41.80
| -93class="loss" |–93.07
| class="loss" |–297.45
| -297.45
|-
!Devin
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-12–12.57'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-15–15.93'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-16–16.45'''
| -31class="loss" |–31.10
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-25–25.47'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-22–22.22'''
| bgcolor="yellow" |'''-123–123.74'''
|}
 
Line 222:
<tr align="center">
<td class="against"> <span class="cand">Erin</span></td>
<td class="against">Martin </td>
<td class="against">Casey </td>
<td class="against"> Riley</td>
Line 231:
<td class="for"> <span class="cand">Erin</span></td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">708</td>
<td class="loss"> 410</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 461 </td>
<td class="loss">298 </td>
Line 237:
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td class="for"> Martin </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 511 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 645</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 461 </td>
<td class="loss"> 458 </td>
Line 246:
<tr align="center">
<td class="for"> Casey </td>
▲<td class="loss"> 460</td>
<td class="loss"> 460 </td>
<td bgcolorclass="yellowloss"> 460 </td>
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 460 </td>
<td class="loss"> 460</td>
<td class="loss"> 460</td>
Line 258:
<td bgcolor="yellow"> 461</td>
<td bgcolor="yellow">440 </td>
<td class="loss"> 312 </td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td class="for">Anna </td>
<td class="loss"> 311</td>
<td class="loss"> 436 </td>
Line 272:
=Rationale=
 
Favourability Voting encompasses all types of different possibilities, whereas with even the most detailed of other alternative voting systems, much of these are ignored. Let’s give an example of a single-winner election. Whereas in regular score voting, a voter who scores a candidate or party 50% could be interpreted as being three entirely different kinds of voters:
 
*Someone who both loves and hates everything in the platform (this can be caused by a conflict in which someone believes that all of these policies will lead to both positive and negative impacts at the same time: "side effects")
 
* Somebody who agrees with half of the platform but disagrees with the other half (for example, if someone is socially conservative and economically left-wing, then combining socially progressive with economically left-wing positions could turn this person into being half in support (on economic issues) and half against them (on social issues)
 
* Or even simply as a person who has neutral opinions (apathetic; doesn’t necessarily approve nor disapprove, just shrugs: some people may know about what a candidate stands for but they just still have no strong opinion about them) on the entirety of the premise
 
So, as you can probably see, these are pretty clearly three different feelings from each other which essentially have little to absolutely nothing in common. Pairwise Favourability Voting, unlike many other systems, is able to understand this and captures these three unique opinions separately: the one who both loves and hates an entity ("love-hate relationship/frenemies") would give it 100% on both approval and disapproval, and those who like half of something but dislike the rest of it ("meh/so-so") go +50% approval and -50% disapproval, whereas an indifferent participant ("whatever/I don't care") would put 0% on both approval and disapproval, and they can also be able to freely express different levels of these conflicting feelings when regarding comparisons, this level of expression allows for a better, more truthful way to sort out our preferences and for providing detailed statistical analysis.
DewyWind
24

edits

Retrieved from "https://electowiki.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/14174"