Improved Condorcet Approval: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>KVenzke mNo edit summary |
imported>KVenzke (add link) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
However, it might be more intuitive, and preferred, if t[a,b] were defined rather as the number of voters ranking ''a'' equal to ''b'' and explicitly voting for both. This requires a change to step #3 only. |
However, it might be more intuitive, and preferred, if t[a,b] were defined rather as the number of voters ranking ''a'' equal to ''b'' and explicitly voting for both. This requires a change to step #3 only. |
||
==Links== |
|||
*[http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-May/015951.html First proposal on the EM list (May 18 2005)] |
|||
[[Category:Single-winner voting systems]] |
[[Category:Single-winner voting systems]] |
||