Independence of irrelevant alternatives: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>DanKeshet (rm wpisms) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
A less strict property is sometimes called '''local independence of irrelevant alternatives'''. It says that if one option (X) wins an election, and a new alternative (Y) is added, X will win the election if Y is not in the [[Smith set]]. |
A less strict property is sometimes called '''local independence of irrelevant alternatives'''. It says that if one option (X) wins an election, and a new alternative (Y) is added, X will win the election if Y is not in the [[Smith set]]. |
||
All [[Condorcet method]]s fail the former criterion, but some (e.g. [[Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping]]) satisfy the latter. |
All [[Condorcet method]]s fail the former criterion, but some (e.g. [[Schulze method|Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping]]) satisfy the latter. |
||
None of the [[Borda count]], [[Coombs' method]] or [[Instant-runoff voting]] meet either criterion. |
None of the [[Borda count]], [[Coombs' method]] or [[Instant-runoff voting]] meet either criterion. |