Instant-runoff voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
Line 484: | Line 484: | ||
Note that this form of visualization becomes harder when allowing for equal-ranking. |
Note that this form of visualization becomes harder when allowing for equal-ranking. |
||
The "A Condorcet winner with over 1/3rd of 1st choice votes is guaranteed to win" [[Dominant mutual third|factoid]] can be used to speed up the counting; in the above example, when the votes were 8 B 9 D 5 C, D was a Condorcet winner: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|+Pairwise counting matrix |
|||
! |
|||
!A |
|||
!B |
|||
!C |
|||
!D |
|||
!E |
|||
|- |
|||
|A |
|||
| --- |
|||
|20 (+18 Win) |
|||
|15 (+8 Win) |
|||
|4 (-14 Loss) |
|||
|20 (+18 Win) |
|||
|- |
|||
|B |
|||
|2 (-18 Loss) |
|||
| --- |
|||
|8 (+6 Win) |
|||
|8 (+6 Win) |
|||
|11 (Tie) |
|||
|- |
|||
|C |
|||
|7 (-8 Loss) |
|||
|14 (-6 Loss) |
|||
| --- |
|||
|5 (-12 Loss) |
|||
|20 (+18 Win) |
|||
|- |
|||
|D |
|||
|18 (+14 Win) |
|||
|14 (-6 Loss) |
|||
|17 (+12 Win) |
|||
| --- |
|||
|20 (+18 Win) |
|||
|- |
|||
|E |
|||
|2 (-18 Loss) |
|||
|11 (Tie) |
|||
|2 (-18 Loss) |
|||
|2 (-18 Loss) |
|||
| --- |
|||
|} |
|||
When looking at only B, C, and D's matchups, this becomes: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|+Pairwise counting matrix |
|||
! |
|||
!B |
|||
!C |
|||
!D |
|||
|- |
|||
|B |
|||
| --- |
|||
|8 (-6 Loss) |
|||
|8 (-6 Loss) |
|||
|- |
|||
|C |
|||
|14 (+6 Win) |
|||
| --- |
|||
|5 (-12 Loss) |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''D''' |
|||
|'''14 (+6 Win)''' |
|||
|'''17 (+12 Win)''' |
|||
|'''---''' |
|||
|} |
|||
D [[Pairwise beat|pairwise wins]] against all others, and had 9 out of the 22 active votes = 40.9%, greater than 1/3rd, at that time. So there was no need to eliminate C at that point to find the winner. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |