Instant-runoff voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 242: | Line 242: | ||
40 B |
40 B |
||
20 A=B </blockquote>If fractional equal-ranking is allowed, the number of votes each candidate has is 50, while if whole-votes equal-ranking is used instead, each candidate has 60 votes. However, they each have only 40 votes in their pairwise matchup.)Several variations of IRV have been proposed to meet the [[Condorcet]] and [[Smith criterion|Smith]] criteria. The simplest of these are to (either (elect the [[Condorcet winner]] if one exists), or (eliminate all candidates not in the [[Smith set]])), and then run IRV. |
20 A=B </blockquote>If fractional equal-ranking is allowed, the number of votes each candidate has is 50, while if whole-votes equal-ranking is used instead, each candidate has 60 votes. However, they each have only 40 votes in their pairwise matchup.)Several variations of IRV have been proposed to meet the [[Condorcet]] and [[Smith criterion|Smith]] criteria. The simplest of these are to (either (elect the [[Condorcet winner]] if one exists), or (eliminate all candidates not in the [[Smith//IRV|Smith set]])), and then run IRV. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
*[[Australian electoral system]] |
*[[Australian electoral system]] |
||