Majority Acceptable Score voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq |
imported>Homunq (→An example: strategy) |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|bgcolor="#cfc"|83 |
|bgcolor="#cfc"|83 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
!bgcolor="#fff"| |
!bgcolor="#fff"|Chattanooga |
||
|bgcolor="#fff"|15 |
|bgcolor="#fff"|15 |
||
|bgcolor="#fff"|22 |
|bgcolor="#fff"|22 |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
Only |
Only Nashville is rated above 0 by a majority, so Nashville (the [[Condorcet winner]]) wins, even though Memphis has a slightly higher score. |
||
If Memphis voters rated Nashville at 0 in the above scenario, they could cause Memphis to win. But Chattanooga and Knoxville voters could protect against this as long as at least 3/4 of them (24% from their combined total of 32%) gave Nashville a 1 (or a 2). |
|||
[[Category:Graded Bucklin systems]] |
[[Category:Graded Bucklin systems]] |