Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval: Difference between revisions

Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval (view source)

325 bytes added , 1 year ago

Linkified names and added link to Warren's MDDB and MDDR examples

1,196

edits

Revision as of 12:08, 1 December 2009 (view source) 80.239.13.202 (talk) (Fixed links) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:35, 21 July 2022 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) (Linkified names and added link to Warren's MDDB and MDDR examples)
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: '''Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval''' or '''MDDA''' is a method devised by [[Kevin Venzke]] for the purpose of showing that the [[Favorite Betrayal criterion]], [[Strategy-Free criterion]], and [[Strong Defensive Strategy criterion]] are mutually compatible. The name was given by [[Mike Ossipoff]]. This method can be viewed as a variant of [[Improved Condorcet Approval]]. Line 22: [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016374.html Method is first proposed on EM, with properties proven (Jun 21 2005)] [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016381.html Mike Ossipoff names the method] *[https://www.rangevoting.org/FBCsurvey.html Warren D. Smith describes other favorite betrayal compliant methods that use majority defeat disqualification - MDD-Range and MDD-Summed-Ranks] [[Category:Single-winner voting ~~systems~~methods]] [[Category:Ranked voting methods]] [[Category:Monotonic electoral systems]] [[Category:No-favorite-betrayal electoral systems]]