Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval: Difference between revisions
Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval (view source)
Revision as of 23:35, 21 July 2022
, 1 year agoLinkified names and added link to Warren's MDDB and MDDR examples
imported>Homunq No edit summary |
(Linkified names and added link to Warren's MDDB and MDDR examples) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
'''Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval''' or '''MDDA''' is a method devised by [[Kevin Venzke]] for the purpose of showing that the [[Favorite Betrayal criterion]], [[Strategy-Free criterion]], and [[Strong Defensive Strategy criterion]] are mutually compatible. The name was given by [[Mike Ossipoff]].
This method can be viewed as a variant of [[Improved Condorcet Approval]].
Line 22:
*[http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016374.html Method is first proposed on EM, with properties proven (Jun 21 2005)]
*[http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016381.html Mike Ossipoff names the method]
*[https://www.rangevoting.org/FBCsurvey.html Warren D. Smith describes other favorite betrayal compliant methods that use majority defeat disqualification - MDD-Range and MDD-Summed-Ranks]
[[Category:Single-winner voting methods]]
[[Category:Ranked voting methods]]
[[Category:Monotonic electoral systems]]
[[Category:No-favorite-betrayal electoral systems]]
| |||