Majority criterion: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Add majority criterion.)
Tag: Removed redirect
No edit summary
Line 1:
The '''majority criterion''' is a criterion for evaluating [[voting system]]s. It can be statedmost simply thought of as follows:"if a majority prefers a candidate as their unique 1st choice (i.e. they prefer this candidate above all other candidates), then the majority's 1st choice must win."
 
The [[mutual majority criterion]], which is sometimes simply called the majority criterion, generalizes the constraint to sets of candidates.
 
The [[Condorcet]] criterion implies the majority criterion. Practically every serious ranked voting method passes the majority criterion. Most [[Cardinal voting|rated voting]] methods fail the majority criterion, such as [[Approval voting|Approval]], [[Score]], and [[STAR voting]], though this is argued to be a good thing in situations where those methods elect a candidate who is well-liked by all voters rather than a candidate who is narrowly preferred by a majority but loathed by the minority.
 
It can be stated as follows:
 
{{definition|If a majority of the voters vote a given candidate X ahead of everybody else, then X must win.}}
 
with the likely most general interpretation of "vote ahead of" being "ranked or rated higher than".
The [[mutual majority criterion]], which is sometimes simply called the majority criterion, generalizes the constraint to sets of candidates.
 
[[Category:Voting theory]]