Maximum Constrained Approval Bucklin: Difference between revisions
Maximum Constrained Approval Bucklin (view source)
Revision as of 22:53, 26 January 2020
, 4 years agoRemove epsilon notice.
m (Add author name to references) |
m (Remove epsilon notice.) |
||
Line 8:
What ended up as FAB was initially proposed in 2017<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2017-January/001276.html|title=Bucklin multiwinner method|website=Election-methods mailing list archives|date=2017-01-06|last=Munsterhjelm|first=K.}}</ref> and simplified in later that year<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2017-September/001584.html|title=A simpler vote management-resistant Bucklin LP|website=Election-methods mailing list archives|date=2017-09-15|last=Munsterhjelm|first=K.}}</ref>. The method detailed here has been further modified from the EM posts to resist Woodall [[free riding]].
== Determining the support for X ==
Line 80 ⟶ 78:
Both candidates have exceeded the Droop quota, but B has greater support, so B is elected. After this, technically speaking, C gets another shot.
Making the case for C, again: Of the 20 remaining votes from electing A, 3
Now every remaining candidate (namely C) is disqualified and the procedure is over. The winners are A and B.
| |||