Maximum Constrained Approval Bucklin: Difference between revisions

m
Add category, remove typo.
m (spelling: change plural "criteria" into singular "criterion" in "Criterion compliances" heading.)
m (Add category, remove typo.)
Line 7:
Determining which voters to eliminate to maximize the support of a candidate subject to earlier constraints is relatively simple to do by linear programming, but hard to do by hand; MCAB can't be counted entirely by hand.
 
What ended up as MCAB was initially proposed in 2017<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2017-January/001276.html|title=Bucklin multiwinner method|website=Election-methods mailing list archives|date=2017-01-06|last=Munsterhjelm|first=K.}}</ref> and simplified in later that year<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2017-September/001584.html|title=A simpler vote management-resistant Bucklin LP|website=Election-methods mailing list archives|date=2017-09-15|last=Munsterhjelm|first=K.}}</ref>. The method detailed here has been further modified from the EM posts to resist Woodall [[free riding]].
 
== Determining the support for X ==
Line 151:
[[Category:Proportional voting methods]]
[[Category:Preferential voting methods]]
[[Category:PSC-compliant voting methods]]
1,196

edits