|
|
|
===Pros===
* Improved [[Proportionate representation]]: EachOnce elected, each elected representative is responsible for a smaller area, and can focus on the specific issues important to the citizens of that region district.
* Improved [[Petitioner Accountability]]: Each citizenvoter fromin thateach district has a specific representative for local issues who they can behold heldaccountable tofor account. ielocal issues withsuch as traffic/, schools/, hospitals, can'tetc. haveFor theissues buckwhere passeda byvoters blaming otherlocal representative. Fordoesn't partisanalign issueswith theythem, wouldvoters could go to the representativeelected official or officials in their cluster who isthey mostvoted likelyfor partisan or issue based representation. Candidates who fail to agreedeliver withon thempromises, likeeither into STVtheir district or to their larger supporter base across the cluster would be easier to vote out, assuming that their supporter base or local electorate wasn't satisfied by their record.
===Cons===
All the "best" candidates may be running in one district, soand when ita iswinner wonin theythat dondistrict'ts competerepresentative inis otherrepresented, races.the Theother partiescandidates wouldin havethat todistrict decidecan whonot to run in whatwin ridingelsewhere. ItFor haspartisan beenimplementations, arguespolitical thatparties a system where representativewould have to attake leastinto haveaccount astrategic mailingnomination addressconsiderations into thedecide riding they hopewho to representrun isin importantwhat for representationdistrict. In the last 2015 Canadian federal election an MP won a district without having a mailing address in Canada.
[[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]]
|