Negative vote: Difference between revisions

psychology vs math ref
(Taiwan website is actually English)
(psychology vs math ref)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:
'''Negative vote''', also called '''bipolar voting'''<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ferguson|first=Daniel|last2=Lowi|first2=Theodore|date=2001|title=Reforming American Electoral Politics: Let's Take “No” for an Answer|url=http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1049096501000506|journal=Political Science & Politics|language=en|volume=34|issue=02|pages=277–280|doi=10.1017/S1049096501000506|issn=1049-0965|via=}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Brams|first=Steven J.|date=2003|title=“Bipolar Voting” Not a New Idea|url=http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1049096503001586|journal=Political Science and Politics|language=en|volume=36|issue=01|pages=1|doi=10.1017/S1049096503001586|issn=1049-0965|via=}}</ref> or '''balanced plurality voting''' ('''BPV''')<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.opednews.com/articles/Yet-Another-Balanced-Votin-by-Paul-Cohen-Balanced-Voting_Election_Polls_Voting-Machine-Election-Fraud-2018-2020-180323-296.html|title=Yet Another Balanced Voting Method|last=Cohen|first=Paul|date=2018-03-23|website=OpEdNews|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-04-20|quote=BPV was the very first example of Balanced Voting (but since then, renamed) to be described in this series of articles.}}</ref> is a modification of [[FPTP]], in which voters can choose to either support a single candidate, or vote against a single candidate. The negative votes are subtracted from positive votes for each candidate, and the candidate with the highest total is the winner.
 
== History and advocacy ==
It was originally proposed by George A.W. Boehm in 1976 in an essay<ref>{{Citation|last=Boehm|first=George A. W.|title=One Fervent Vote against Wintergreen|date=1976|volume=|pages=|type=Unpublished mimeograph}}</ref> sent to various social choice theorists, which referenced the plot of the 1931 musical [[W:Of Thee I Sing|''Of Thee I Sing'']], in which a candidate wins the US presidency despite being a bumbling crook,<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.negative.vote/about/|title=About|website=Negative Vote|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-19|date=|last=|first=|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=live|quote=curb the influence of extremists on both sides of the political spectrum and empower the middle-minded, moderate majority}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Poundstone|first=William|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hbxL3A-pWagC|title=Gaming the Vote: Why Elections Aren't Fair (and What We Can Do About It)|date=2009-02-17|publisher=Farrar, Straus and Giroux|isbn=978-0-8090-4892-2|language=en|year=|location=|pages=}}</ref>{{Rp|187}} proposing that voters be given the option to vote ''against'' a candidate like Wintergreen rather than ''for'' someone else.
 
[[Steven Brams]] was initially interested in Boehm's proposal, and analyzed the system in three-candidate elections,<ref name=":4">{{Citation|last=Brams|first=Steven J.|title=When is it Advantageous to Cast a Negative Vote?|date=1977|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-45494-3_45|work=Mathematical Economics and Game Theory|volume=141|pages=564–572|editor-last=Henn|editor-first=Rudolf|publisher=Springer Berlin Heidelberg|doi=10.1007/978-3-642-45494-3_45|isbn=978-3-540-08063-3|access-date=2020-04-19|editor2-last=Moeschlin|editor2-first=Otto}}</ref> but soon learned of [[approval voting]] from Robert Weber, compared the two systems,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Brams|first=Steven|date=1976|title=One Man, n Votes, Module in Applied Mathematics|url=|journal=Mathematical Association of America, Ithaca: Cornell University|volume=|pages=|via=}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Citation|last=Brams|first=Steven J.|title=Comparison Voting|date=1983|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4612-5430-0_3|work=Political and Related Models|volume=|pages=32–65|editor-last=|editor-first=|publisher=Springer New York|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-1-4612-5430-0_3|isbn=978-1-4612-5432-4|access-date=2020-04-19|editor2-last=|editor2-first=|editor3-last=|editor3-first=}}</ref> and started advocating for approval voting instead.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite book|last=Brams|first=Steven J.|url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/mediawiki/oclc/ocm96045998|title=Approval voting|last2=Fishburn|first2=Peter C.|date=2007|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-0-387-49895-9|edition=2nd ed|location=New York|oclc=ocm96045998|year=|pages=}}</ref>{{Rp|xv}}
 
It is currently advocated by the Negative Vote Association in Taiwan,<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.negativevote.org/pagesen/pid_0/8.html?lang=en|title=About Us|last=|first=|date=|website=負數票協會 Negative Vote Association|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-04-20|quote=will weed out extremist candidates, societies will become more harmonious internally and less likely to go to war against neighbors.}}</ref> chiefly by Sam (Tien Shang) Chang, and by NEGATIVE.VOTE in Chicago (though this organization has expanded<ref name=":3" /> to adding a negative option to other voting methods as well, such as [[W:Combined approval voting|Balanced Approval]], Balanced [[Instant-runoff voting|RCV]], etc.)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.negative.vote/|title=Home|website=Negative Vote|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-20}}</ref>
 
It is intended to eliminate extremist candidates, empower moderates, encourage positive campaigning,<ref name=":5" />{{Rp|35}} and promote more peaceful politics.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" />
 
== Notes ==
Although negative voting is mathematically equivalent to FPTP in two-candidate elections,<ref name=":4" /> and equivalent to approval voting in three-candidate elections, the psychological impact of voting against a candidate may nevertheless change voter behavior and turnout.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Baujard|first=Antoinette|last2=Gavrel|first2=Frédéric|last3=Igersheim|first3=Herrade|last4=Laslier|first4=Jean-François|last5=Lebon|first5=Isabelle|date=|year=2018|title=How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting|url=https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01618039/document|journal=European Journal of Political Economy|volume=55|pages=6–9|doi=10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.006|issn=0176-2680|via=}}</ref>
 
The common argument Negative vote advocates make is that in a two-faction election, partisans of both sides will "cancel each other out" by putting positive votes on their own side's candidates and negative votes on the other side's candidates, allowing candidates "in the middle" to win with some votes from centrist voters and no opposition from the partisans, who will be more focused on stopping the other side.