PAL representation: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

@@ Line 151: / Line 151: @@
 |}
+District assignment proceeds in the following order:
-District assignment proceeds in the following order: A:1, B:2, C:5, C:3, A:4, C:6. Note that C gets 3 districts where party P was weak, B gets just 1 district where party P was strong, and A has one of each. Thus, at the end, A has 601 constituents; B, 550; and C, 600. This is a more balanced arrangement than their original vote totals (771, 549, and 431 respectively).
+* A:1 (400 constituents)
+* B:2 (550 constituents)
+* C:5 (200 constituents)
+* C:3 (200 more constituents, 400 total)
+* A:4 (201 more constituents, 601 total)
+* C:6 (200 more constituents, 600 total)
+Note that C gets 3 districts where party P was weak, B gets just 1 district where party P was strong, and A has one of each. Thus, at the end, A has 601 constituents; B, 550; and C, 600. This is a more balanced arrangement than their original vote totals (771, 549, and 431 respectively).
 == Advantages ==