Pairwise counting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Added heading and refined wording) |
|||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
| align="left" | 17% |
| align="left" | 17% |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Election examples == |
|||
Here is an example of a pairwise victory table for the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Burlington_mayoral_election Burlington 2009] election: |
Here is an example of a pairwise victory table for the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Burlington_mayoral_election Burlington 2009] election: |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
Line 209: | Line 211: | ||
The following terms are often used when discussing pairwise counting: |
The following terms are often used when discussing pairwise counting: |
||
'''Pairwise win/beat''' and '''pairwise lose''': When one candidate receives more votes in a pairwise matchup/comparison against another candidate, |
'''Pairwise win/beat''' and '''pairwise lose''': When one candidate receives more votes in a pairwise matchup/comparison against another candidate, the former candidate "pairwise beats" the latter candidate, and the latter candidate "pairwise loses." |
||
'''Pairwise winner''' and '''pairwise loser''': |
'''Pairwise winner''' and '''pairwise loser''': The candidate who pairwise wins is the pairwise winner of the matchup. The other candidate is the pairwise loser of the matchup. |
||
'''Pairwise tie''': |
'''Pairwise tie''': Occurs when two candidates receive the same number of votes in their pairwise matchup. |
||
'''Pairwise order/ranking''': Also known as a [[Condorcet ranking]], |
'''Pairwise order/ranking''': Also known as a [[Condorcet ranking]], is the ranking of candidates such that each candidate is ranked above all candidates they pairwise beat. Sometimes such a ranking does not exist due to the [[Condorcet paradox]]. As a related concept, there is always a [[Smith set ranking|Smith ranking]] that applies to groups of candidates. |
||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |