Parliamentary government formation: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
(This section has some opinions from various advocacy groups).
(This section has some opinions from various advocacy groups).


It would be unexpected for the leader of any party to be the member with the highest confidence of the house. Because of which, the standard process of government formation can be claimed to not adhere particularly well to the concept of a representative government where all representatives have equal power. Instead, it would be desirable to choose a Prime Minister through election by the members in a similar manner as the members were chosen in the first place. In principle, this could be a member which leads no party but has broad general support of the parliament. The role of the official opposition in the Westminster System is an important check on governmental power. The leader of the opposition must also be selected to form this opposition. It would be desirable if the government and the opposition were optimally polarized to each other so that opposition could be ensured.
It would be unexpected for the leader of any party to be the member with the highest confidence of the house. Because of which, the standard process of government formation can be claimed to not adhere particularly well to the concept of a representative government where all representatives have equal power. Instead, it would be desirable to choose a Prime Minister through election by the members in a similar manner as the members were chosen in the first place. In principle, this could be a member which leads no party, but has broad general support of the parliament. The role of the official opposition in the Westminster System is an important check on governmental power. The leader of the opposition must also be selected to form this opposition. It would be desirable if the government and the opposition were optimally polarized to each other so that opposition could be ensured.


There is much desire to find a leader who would have high confidence of the house but this is difficult to select. Forming coalitions which comprise a majority has been known to take a very long time as well. There is likely no way to force a majority of members to agree on a leader so minority governments are unavoidable. (One possible majority rule-based alternative would be to use [[Condorcet voting]] to find a [[Beats-all winner|beats-all winner]] or at least a [[Smith set]] of viable candidates to lead the government, possibly by using [[Smith//Approval]] to find the candidate with the largest majority approval in the Smith set. Candidates not in the Smith set could be eliminated over [[Repeated balloting|repeated ballotings]].)
There is much desire to find a leader who would have high confidence of the house but this is difficult to select. Forming coalitions which comprise a majority has been known to take a very long time as well. There is likely no way to force a majority of members to agree on a leader so minority governments are unavoidable. (One possible majority rule-based alternative would be to use [[Condorcet voting]] to find a [[Beats-all winner|beats-all winner]] or at least a [[Smith set]] of viable candidates to lead the government, possibly by using [[Smith//Approval]] to find the candidate with the largest majority approval in the Smith set. Candidates not in the Smith set could be eliminated over [[Repeated balloting|repeated ballotings]].)