Plurality criterion: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
imported>KVenzke
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
<h4 class=left>=Statement of Criterion</h4>criterion==
 
<p><em>{{Definition|If the number of ballots ranking ''A'' as the first preference is greater than the number of ballots on which another candidate ''B'' is given any preference, then ''AB''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s probabilitymust of election mustnot be greater than ''B''<nowiki>'</nowiki>selected.</em></p>}}
 
<h4 class=left>=Complying Methods</h4>methods==
 
<p>[[Plurality voting|First-Preference Plurality]], [[Approval voting]], [[IRV]], and many [[Condorcet method|Condorcet methods]] (using [[winning votes]] as defeat strength) satisfy the Plurality criterion. [[Condorcet method|Condorcet methods]] using margins as the measure of defeat strength fail it, as does [[Raynaud]] (using either winning votes or margins as the measure of defeat strength), and also [[Minmax|Minmax(pairwise opposition)]].</p>
 
<h4 class=left>=Commentary</h4>==
 
ItWhen isthe difficultPlurality tocriterion imaginerequires that a''B'' methodnot couldbe haveelected, ait goodmeans reasonthat toeven electif ''B'' over ''A'' whenall the voters givingwho gave ''B some'' any ranking atwere allto areelevate outnumberedhim byto the voterstop whoposition, rankedhe ''A''would asstill beingnot be the best[[Plurality candidate.voting|First ThePreference Plurality]] criterion is about avoiding such unintuitive resultswinner.
 
It also means that ''A'' has a stronger pairwise victory over ''B'' than ''B'' has even a path of victories to any other candidate.
 
It is conceivable that if ''B'' were elected, voters might not consider this a legitimate result.
 
One connection the Plurality criterion has to most voting methods is that it implies that when all voters bullet vote (in Score voting, also max-scoring the bullet-voted candidate), the candidate bullet voted by the most voters (i.e. the [[FPTP]] winner) will win. Most voting methods do this. An extension of this is to check whether, for a given voting method, when all voters vote some candidates 1st and all other candidates last (and [[Min-max voting|Min-max vote]] in Score), then the candidate marked 1st on the most ballots (the [[Approval voting]] winner) wins. This isn't passed by all voting methods; for example, [[IRV]] with its most common equal-ranking implementation, [[Equal-ranking methods in IRV|fractional equal-ranking]], doesn't necessarily elect such a candidate.
 
== Plurality criterion for rated ballots ==
<p>Example where [[Score voting]] fails if the definition of the criterion is extended to scored ballots:</p>
 
<p>3 A:1</p>1 C:5 B:4
 
1 D:5 B:4
 
Scores are A 3, C 5, B 8, D 5, making B the winner. Yet when looking at the rankings:
 
3 A
 
1 C>B
 
1 D>B
 
B is preferred on 2 ballots, while A is preferred 1st on 3 ballots. However, Score voting passes a related criterion: "If the number of ballots giving A maximal support is greater than the number of ballots on which another candidate B is given any support, then B must not be elected." This is because candidate B can't get more points than A, since even if all voters who score B give B the maximum score, candidate A will have more ballots giving them the maximum score than B, and thus more points.
 
[[Category:Voting system criteria]]
1,204

edits