Proportional approval voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(WikipediaBot - Robot: Changing category Voting systems)
imported>DanBishop
(addition of an example)
Line 26: Line 26:
The system disadvantages minority groups who share some preferences with the majority. In terms of [[tactical voting]], it is therefore highly desirable to withhold approval from candidates who are likely to be elected in any case, as with [[cumulative voting]] and the [[single non-transferable vote]].
The system disadvantages minority groups who share some preferences with the majority. In terms of [[tactical voting]], it is therefore highly desirable to withhold approval from candidates who are likely to be elected in any case, as with [[cumulative voting]] and the [[single non-transferable vote]].


== Example ==

2 seats to be filled, four candidates: Andrea (A), Brad (B), Carter (C), and Delilah (D). The ballots are:

* 5: AB
* 17: AC
* 8: D

There are 6 possible results: AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, and CD.

{| border
! !! AB !! AC !! AD !! BC !! BD !! CD
|-
| voters approving 2 successful candidates (satisfaction of 1+1/2) || 5 || 17 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0
|-
| voters approving 1 successful candidate (satisfaction of 1) || 17 || 5 || 30 || 22 || 13 || 25
|-
| voters approving no successful candidates (satisfaction of 0) || 8 || 8 || 0 || 8 || 17 || 5
|-
| total satisfaction || 24.5 || '''30.5''' || 30 || 22 || 13 || 25
|}

Andrea and Carter are elected.


{{fromwikipedia}}
{{fromwikipedia}}