Quick Runoff: Difference between revisions

No change in size ,  10 months ago
m
capitalization: Independence of clones
mNo edit summary
m (capitalization: Independence of clones)
Line 13:
QR satisfies [[Later-no-harm]] because if candidate X is elected, the addition of a lower preference can only cause X to lose if it creates a majority defeat of X by the candidate that follows X in descending first preference order. This cannot be done by a voter who prefers X to the new preference.
 
QR fails [[Mono-raise|monotonicity]] ([[Mono-raise]] and [[Mono-add-top]] at least) and is not [[Independence of Clonesclones|clone-independent]]. It is quite possible for a candidate to wish he had a different position in the first-preference ordering, even if it means receiving fewer votes.
 
QR also doesn't satisfy [[Later-no-help]]. In particular, in a three candidate scenario where A has the most first preferences and C the fewest, C may have incentive to insincerely create a majority win for B over A, if the C voters believe C has the second-preferences of the A voters. So, while the A voters technically have both Later-no-harm and Later-no-help guarantees with respect to A, there may be an incentive to withhold their second preference if they feel other factions are relying on those second preferences in order to try to steal the race from A.
1,196

edits