Ranked preference approval voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Work in progress on RPAV methods) |
(Formalized tier ballot) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ranked Preference Approval Voting (RPAV) is a general term used to describe voting methods with approval inferred from a ranked ballot (equal ranking and ranking-gaps allowed), but is used specifically for two different single-winner methods and one multiwinner [[proportional representation]] method. |
Ranked Preference Approval Voting (RPAV) is a general term used to describe voting methods with approval inferred from a ranked ballot (equal ranking and ranking-gaps allowed), but is used specifically for two different single-winner methods and one multiwinner [[proportional representation]] method. |
||
=== |
=== Ballot format === |
||
The goal of RPAV is to emulate a general ranking with an explicit approval cutoff via a fixed ranking format with constant approval cutoff level. If you want to emulate the effect of being able to put an explicit approval cutoff somewhere in an M-level ranking, then you need 2*M ranks, with the top M ranks approved. This lets you rank M candidates as approved, or up to M-1 candidates disapproved but not last. |
|||
To de-emphasize *rating*, even though it could be considered equivalent to a score ballot, the RPAV ballot is set up as N ranked *tiers*. The terminology *tier* is chosen because a rank level is not exclusive --- more than one candidate can be ranked on a tier level --- and it is not necessary to rank a candidate on each tier. The default number of tiers is 6, which lets voters put an explicit approval cutoff somewhere in 3 ranking levels, an adequate level of resolution for most public elections. |
|||
==== Top Three Tournament ==== |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
RPAV-T3: Ranked preference approval ballot (score 5 = Most Approved, score 4 = Approved, score 3 = Slightly Approved, score 2 = Slightly Disapproved Compromise, score 1 = Disapproved Compromise, score 0 = Strongly Disapproved and Rejected [or blank]). |
|||
|+ |
|||
!Tier |
|||
!Approved |
|||
!Description |
|||
|- |
|||
|1 |
|||
|Yes |
|||
|Most/Strongly approved |
|||
|- |
|||
|2 |
|||
|Yes |
|||
|Approved |
|||
|- |
|||
|3 |
|||
|Yes |
|||
|Slightly/Barely approved |
|||
|- |
|||
|4 |
|||
|No |
|||
|Slightly/Barely disapproved |
|||
|- |
|||
|5 |
|||
|No |
|||
|Disapproved |
|||
|- |
|||
|6 |
|||
|No |
|||
|Most/Strongly Disapproved; Rejected; Unknown |
|||
|} |
|||
===Single Winner RPAV methods === |
|||
Count candidate scores of 3-5 as approved, 0-2 as disapproved. Sort the candidates in descending order of approval, and take the top three approved candidates. Use rankings inferred from ratings to form a pairwise matrix for those three candidates. The pairwise winner of the highest approved candidate versus the pairwise winner between the second and third most approved candidates wins the election. |
|||
==== |
====Top Three Tournament==== |
||
RPAV-T3: |
|||
⚫ | |||
* Use a 6-tier approval ballot as above. |
|||
* Sort the candidates in descending order of approval, and take the top three approved candidates. (A = approval winner, B = approval runner-up, C = approval third place) |
|||
* Use rankings to form a pairwise matrix for those three candidates. |
|||
** If a ballot rates candidate X higher than candidate Y, X receives a vote in the pairwise X-Y contest, and visa-versa. |
|||
* The winner is the pairwise winner of the highest approved candidate versus the pairwise winner between the second and third most approved candidates wins the election. In other words, T3-winner = PW(A, PW(B,C)) |
|||
====Smith//Approval==== |
|||
RPAV-Smith-Approval: |
|||
* Same ballot as RPAV-T3. |
|||
* Find Smith Set: |
|||
** Compute Pairwise matrix |
|||
** Initialize Smith Set as empty set |
|||
** Find candidate(s) with the smallest number of pairwise losses, add them to Smith Set |
|||
** For each untested Smith Set candidate, add in any candidates not already in Smith Set who defeat that candidate. |
|||
⚫ |