Ranked preference approval voting: Difference between revisions
(Formalized tier ballot) |
m (→Ballot format: Clarification) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ranked Preference Approval Voting (RPAV) is a general term used to describe voting methods with approval inferred from a ranked ballot (equal ranking and ranking-gaps allowed), but is used specifically for two different single-winner methods and one multiwinner [[proportional representation]] method. |
Ranked Preference Approval Voting (RPAV) is a general term used to describe voting methods with approval inferred from a ranked ballot (equal ranking and ranking-gaps allowed), but is used specifically for two different single-winner methods and one multiwinner [[proportional representation]] method. |
||
=== Ballot format === |
=== Single Winner Ballot format === |
||
The goal of RPAV is to emulate a general ranking with an explicit approval cutoff |
The goal of RPAV single-winner is to emulate a general ranking with an explicit approval cutoff through use of a fixed ranking format with constant approval cutoff level. If you want to emulate the effect of being able to put an explicit approval cutoff somewhere in an M-level ranking, then you need 2*M ranks, with the top M ranks approved. This lets you rank M candidates as approved, or up to M-1 candidates disapproved but not last. |
||
To de-emphasize *rating*, even though it could be considered equivalent to a score ballot, the RPAV ballot is set up as N ranked *tiers*. The terminology *tier* is chosen because a rank level is not exclusive --- more than one candidate can be ranked on a tier level --- and it is not necessary to rank a candidate on each tier. The default number of tiers is 6, which lets voters put an explicit approval cutoff somewhere in 3 ranking levels, an adequate level of resolution for most public elections. |
To de-emphasize *rating*, even though it could be considered equivalent to a score ballot, the RPAV ballot is set up as N ranked *tiers*. The terminology *tier* is chosen because a rank level is not exclusive --- more than one candidate can be ranked on a tier level --- and it is not necessary to rank a candidate on each tier. The default number of tiers is 6, which lets voters put an explicit approval cutoff somewhere in 3 ranking levels, an adequate level of resolution for most public elections. |
Revision as of 21:34, 17 May 2023
Ranked Preference Approval Voting (RPAV) is a general term used to describe voting methods with approval inferred from a ranked ballot (equal ranking and ranking-gaps allowed), but is used specifically for two different single-winner methods and one multiwinner proportional representation method.
Single Winner Ballot format
The goal of RPAV single-winner is to emulate a general ranking with an explicit approval cutoff through use of a fixed ranking format with constant approval cutoff level. If you want to emulate the effect of being able to put an explicit approval cutoff somewhere in an M-level ranking, then you need 2*M ranks, with the top M ranks approved. This lets you rank M candidates as approved, or up to M-1 candidates disapproved but not last.
To de-emphasize *rating*, even though it could be considered equivalent to a score ballot, the RPAV ballot is set up as N ranked *tiers*. The terminology *tier* is chosen because a rank level is not exclusive --- more than one candidate can be ranked on a tier level --- and it is not necessary to rank a candidate on each tier. The default number of tiers is 6, which lets voters put an explicit approval cutoff somewhere in 3 ranking levels, an adequate level of resolution for most public elections.
Tier | Approved | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Yes | Most/Strongly approved |
2 | Yes | Approved |
3 | Yes | Slightly/Barely approved |
4 | No | Slightly/Barely disapproved |
5 | No | Disapproved |
6 | No | Most/Strongly Disapproved; Rejected; Unknown |
Single Winner RPAV methods
Top Three Tournament
RPAV-T3:
- Use a 6-tier approval ballot as above.
- Sort the candidates in descending order of approval, and take the top three approved candidates. (A = approval winner, B = approval runner-up, C = approval third place)
- Use rankings to form a pairwise matrix for those three candidates.
- If a ballot rates candidate X higher than candidate Y, X receives a vote in the pairwise X-Y contest, and visa-versa.
- The winner is the pairwise winner of the highest approved candidate versus the pairwise winner between the second and third most approved candidates wins the election. In other words, T3-winner = PW(A, PW(B,C))
Smith//Approval
RPAV-Smith-Approval:
- Same ballot as RPAV-T3.
- Find Smith Set:
- Compute Pairwise matrix
- Initialize Smith Set as empty set
- Find candidate(s) with the smallest number of pairwise losses, add them to Smith Set
- For each untested Smith Set candidate, add in any candidates not already in Smith Set who defeat that candidate.
- Winner is the highest approved member of the Smith set. For three candidates, the winner of RPAV-T3 is the same as the winner of RPAV-Smith-Approval.