Reciprocal Score Voting: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 21:
This system is [[monotonicity criterion|non-monotonic]] and suffers from a very unusual "reverse [[spoiler effect]]", in which a larger faction may lose an election by not supporting smaller supportive factions. Therefore, larger factions are encouraged to promote smaller factions as much as possible in order to win.
The <math>\min(\cdot, 1)</math> condition above is required so that support is never amplified by asymmetry. This is also necessary so that a smaller faction cannot parasite on the support of a larger faction, which will never rate the smaller faction above its own. A smaller faction artificially rating a larger faction too highly will only receive exactly as much support as the larger faction is willing to give to it.
== Implementation ==
| |||