STLR voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) (typeos and examples) |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) (add variant) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
The voter themselves would always want their impact maximized but they also do not want tyranny of the majority. STLR finds the middle ground. No matter who is in the runoff the voter has their score levelled in a fair manner. |
The voter themselves would always want their impact maximized but they also do not want tyranny of the majority. STLR finds the middle ground. No matter who is in the runoff the voter has their score levelled in a fair manner. |
||
==Simple Variant== |
|||
Some find the concepts of multiplication in the levelling procedure difficult to understand. Because of this, a simplified variant of STLR voting exists. In this method the runoff is done with putting only the best of the 2 candidates to <math>MAX</math>. The other candidate keeps the score he already has to avoid all references to levelling or normalization. This pushes the method slightly more in the majoritarian direction but not so far as STAR. |
|||
==Sequential elimination System== |
==Sequential elimination System== |
||