Sequential proportional approval voting: Difference between revisions
Sequential proportional approval voting (view source)
Revision as of 10:54, 4 September 2020
, 3 years agoFix CS1 error
(Fixed link) |
m (Fix CS1 error) |
||
Line 9:
The system disadvantages minority groups who share some preferences with the majority. In terms of [[tactical voting]], it is therefore desirable to [[ Free riding | free ride ]] by withholding approval from candidates who are likely to be elected in any case. With the standard [[Jefferson method]] based reweighing it favours large factions in an attempt to mitigate [[Free_riding#Vote_Management | vote management]]. On the other hand [[D'Hondt method]] based reweighting is more fair to smaller factions.
It is however a much computationally simpler algorithm than (and can be considered a sequential form of) [[proportional approval voting]], permitting votes to be counted either by hand or by computer, rather than requiring a computer to determine the outcome of all but the simplest elections.<ref name="AzizGaspers2014">{{
== Notes ==
| |||