Single distributed vote: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 138:
One clear benefit is that [[Single distributed vote]] is scale-invariant while [[Reweighted Range Voting]] is not. The [[Kotze-Pereira transformation]] can be used to add scale invariance to [[Reweighted Range Voting]] but it is an added complication to the system. The details can be seen on the page [[Kotze-Pereira_transformation#Scale_Invariance_example_for_RRV | here]].
== Notes ==
SDV decays into a [[Highest averages method]] in its [[party list case]]. This is because each voter who has supported a winner will have given that winner and any previous winners max scores, which can just be interpreted as votes. So for example, a voter who has supported the current round's winner and supported 3 previous winners is considered to have 1/(1+2*3)=1/7th of their ballot weight remaining, if using the [[Webster]]-based formula.
==References==
Line 145 ⟶ 146:
[[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]]
[[Category:Cardinal PR methods]]
<references />
[[Category:Highest averages-reducing voting
| |||