Single transferable vote: Difference between revisions

Single transferable vote (view source)

189 bytes removed , 2 months ago

→‎Ways of dealing with equal rankings: Random assignment would be the same as fractional ranking with large samples; no real point

185

edits

Revision as of 09:18, 4 April 2022 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) (Add link to New York 1937-1947, remove some dead links and do general cleanup) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:44, 29 February 2024 (view source) Closed Limelike Curves (talk \| contribs) (→‎Ways of dealing with equal rankings: Random assignment would be the same as fractional ranking with large samples; no real point) Tag: Visual edit Newer edit →
Line 184: === Ways of dealing with equal rankings === * Disallowing them, requiring full rankings Giving one vote to one of the top-ranked candidates, and giving no vote to the other top-ranked candidates (likely best done by choosing randomly which top-ranked candidate gets the vote) ER-IRV (fractional): Counting a ballot with N top-ranked candidates as 1/N of a vote for each candidate. * ER-IRV (whole votes) or Approval-IRV: Giving one vote to each equally-top-ranked candidate. Can optionally be combined with a suggestion that ballots that equally rank candidates shouldn't be able to prevent the elimination of those candidates.<ref name="reddit 2011">{{cite web \| title=Proportionality failure in STV with equal-ranks with whole votes : EndFPTP \| website=reddit \| date=2019-12-05 \| url=https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/e6bt6s/proportionality_failure_in_stv_with_equalranks/f9thuy4/?context=8&depth=9 \| access-date=2020-02-10}}</ref>