Anonymous user
Method support poll: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>KVenzke |
No edit summary |
||
Line 28:
Oppose: [[plurality voting|plurality]], [[IRV]], [[ER-IRV]], margins, [[Borda count|Borda]], [[DSC]], rating ballots
*'''Juho Laatu'''
Support:
*[[Condorcet Criterion|Condorcet]]: best for contentious elections if burying threat considered not too bad
*[[Minmax|Minmax(margins)]]: my default reference point, good utility function, strategy resistance maybe not that bad
*Path based ([[Schulze method|Schulze]] etc.) and winning votes: ok but lots of work for small improvements/changes (that are not all positive)
*Pairwise comparison methods enhanced with additional approval or rating information: ok as well if not too complex for the voters
*[[Approval voting|Approval]]: clean method and at least some improvement to the commonly user methods
*[[IRV]] methods (if Condorcet is out of question)
Close to supporting: [[Runoff voting|Two round system]] (not that bad for multiparty countries)
Not supporting: Rating based methods (maybe not feasible for contentious elections like the government official elections of this query, but good for non-contentious elections)
Oppose:
*[[plurality voting|Plurality]] (except that it is ok for two party countries IF they want to stay that way)
*Regional winner gets all votes of that region
*[[Borda count|Borda]] and many other ("more heuristic") methods
==Legislative election methods==
| |||