Spoiler effect: Difference between revisions

{{see-wp}}The spoiler effect can broadly be thought of as a situation where, when a particular candidate or set of candidate(s) are running, some candidate not in the set (call him X) wins, but when that particular set of candidate(s) aren't running, some different candidate who's also not in the set wins (call him Y). The [[Independence of irrelevant alternatives]] article has more information on this broad interpretation of the spoiler effect.

In some sense, much of [[Voting theory|voting theory]] is really just an attempt to mitigate the effects of various things that might be considered "spoiler effects". For example, [[Condorcet method|Condorcet methods]] and many [[Rated method|rated methods]] attempt to elect a candidate who can beat all other candidates in a [[Pairwise counting|head-to-head matchup]] (assuming voters cast the same ballots no matter which candidates are in the race); this arguably reduces the ability of losing candidates to drop out to impact the race.