Strategy-free criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (definition template) |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Statement of criterion == |
== Statement of criterion == |
||
{{definition|If a Condorcet candidate exists, and if a majority prefers this candidate to another candidate, then the other candidate should not win if that majority votes sincerely and no other voter falsifies any preferences.}} |
{{definition|If a Condorcet candidate exists, and if a majority prefers this candidate to another candidate, then the other candidate should not win if that majority votes sincerely and no other voter falsifies any preferences.{{clarify|this sounds like it just means “If everyone is honest, the majority-Condorcet winner wins”; which isn’t really a strategy-resistance criterion…}}}} |
||
In a ranked method, it is nearly equivalent to say: {{definition|If more than half of the voters rank ''x'' above ''y'', and there is no candidate ''z'' whom more than half of the voters rank above ''x'', then ''y'' must not be elected.}} |
In a ranked method, it is nearly equivalent to say: {{definition|If more than half of the voters rank ''x'' above ''y'', and there is no candidate ''z'' whom more than half of the voters rank above ''x'', then ''y'' must not be elected.}} |
||
== Complying methods == |
== Complying methods == |
||