Symmetrical ICT: Difference between revisions
→History
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 34:
==History==
The tied-at-the-top rule and Improved Condorcet ideas were devised by Kevin Venzke in an effort to create a [[Minmax]] variant that passes the [[FBC]]. Then, later, Chris Benham proposed completion by top-count, to avoid the [[chicken dilemma]] and thus achieve defection-resistance.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2012-January/094905.html|title=TTPBA//TR (a 3-slot ABE solution)|website=Election-methods mailing list archives|date=2012-01-13|last=Benham|first=C.}}</ref> Mike Ossipoff shortened the name of this method to "Improved
Mike later proposed that the ICT tied-at-the-top rule also be applied to the bottom end, to almost achieve [[later-no-help]] compliance, which then led to Symmetrical ICT.
| |||