Talk:Asset voting: Difference between revisions

 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 75:
This voting system may be used as a model to coordinate multiple heterogenous [[autonomous system]]s which have a [[mission]] with multiple [[goal|objective]]s. The autonomous systems are allowed to influence the [[weight]]s assigned to each objective. Results from a [[simulation]] demonstrated a level of overall mission success comparable to that obtained in an ideal centralised mechanism.<ref>{{cite conference|title=The coordination of multiple autonomous systems using information theoretic political science voting models|coauthors=A. Abel, S. Sukkarieh|publisher=IEEE|booktitle=2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering|date=24-26 April 2006|year=2006|url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/10995/34635/01652289.pdf?temp=x}}</ref>
 
== '''References =='''
: It's from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asset_voting&action=history which you can't see unless you're a Wikipedia admin. I posted it here in case there's some content that can be rescued from the deleted article. If it's all redundant, then delete it from here, too. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 02:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 
== References ==
<references/>
 
Line 85 ⟶ 83:
 
:Can we remove the old Wikipedia content above from the Talk: page? We can add it in an appropriate spot on this wiki if we find a place that makes sense and if it belongs on Electowiki, but I made a rudimentary attempt to find the original content in the history over on enwiki, and wasn't able to find it. We should make sure we keep track of the provenance of the text that gets added to this wiki, and this takes a big block of this Talk: page, but isn't really part of a conversation. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 01:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 
:: It's from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asset_voting&action=history which you can't see unless you're a Wikipedia admin. I posted it here in case there's some content that can be rescued from the deleted article. If it's all redundant, then delete it from here, too. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 02:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 
::: Thanks for the prompt response, [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]]. I appreciate your taking the time to pull things that were aggressively deleted from English Wikipedia (enwiki). I'm an enwiki admin too, so I can at least see the old revisions. What is the oldid and/or timestamp of the revision you pulled this from? We might want to cite the [[w:Wayback Machine|Wayback Machine]] version of the article as the public source. Ultimately, someone should probably do a plagiarism-free rewrite of the parts we want to keep. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 19:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 
:::: It looks like I got it from timestamp 20090918105700 before one of its deletions. [https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_voting Wayback Machine doesn't seem to go back that far]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 05:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 
== Asset voting discussion over on reddit ==
 
[[User:Psephomancy]] started a very interesting discussion about [[asset voting]] over on the EndFPTP subreddit. The discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/eniyfl/i_dont_understand_why_anyone_likes_asset_voting/
 
I haven't had the chance to really read through it, and wrap my brain around the pros and the cons, but it looks like it prompted many great explanations of asset voting that could be used to improve this article. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 20:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)