Talk:Cardinal voting systems: Difference between revisions
→(There is never incentive for favorite betrayal by giving a higher score to a candidate who is liked less.), (Furthermore, all cardinal methods satisfy the participation criterion.), and, can Smith//Score or Condorcet//Score be considered cardinal methods?
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 20:
Also, I'd like to ask if [[Smith//Score]] or Condorcet//Score can reasonably be added to this page as cardinal (or semi-cardinal?) methods. Both methods use cardinal information when there is no weak Condorcet winner. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 21:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
: Hmm, STAR is a hybrid of cardinal and ordinal utility, no? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 03:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
| |||