Talk:Condorcet winner criterion: Difference between revisions
reply to User:RobLa
(hmm...looks like I was wrong about the Smith set. btw, where is "weak Condorcet winner" defined?) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (reply to User:RobLa) |
||
Line 13:
:::: ''a candidate who beats or ties with every other candidate in a pairwise matchup. There can be more than one weak Condorcet winner.''
::: That article doesn't have a citation for that definition, though. What is the best citation for "weak Condorcet method"? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 23:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I don't know of a citation, but it's listed here, too: [[Condorcet_method#Related_terms]] — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 00:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
| |||