Talk:IRV Prime: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 17:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC) |
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 17:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
There's also P4 (realized from offline discussion with Marcus): |
|||
{{ballots| |
|||
abc: 3N + 2 |
|||
acb: 2N |
|||
bca: 3N |
|||
bac: 2N + 1 |
|||
cab: 3N |
|||
cba: 2N}} |
|||
Which has some different truths: |
|||
* For all N, a wins in IRV (c is eliminated, a wins against b) |
|||
* For N=1, a is the condorcet winner (& thus the 1st premise, that c becomes the condorcet, doesn't hold) |
|||
* For N>=2, a '''does not win''' in IRV-Prime (& thus the 2nd premise, that a wins, doesn't hold) |
|||
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 00:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
I've transposed the examples on the page you listed (elections 3-5) [[https://github.com/marcosb/vse-sim/blob/master/methods.py to code]], but not sure what I'm looking for: |
I've transposed the examples on the page you listed (elections 3-5) [[https://github.com/marcosb/vse-sim/blob/master/methods.py to code]], but not sure what I'm looking for: |
||