Talk:IRV Prime: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
* For N>=2, a '''does not win''' in IRV-Prime (& thus the 2nd premise, that a wins, doesn't hold) |
* For N>=2, a '''does not win''' in IRV-Prime (& thus the 2nd premise, that a wins, doesn't hold) |
||
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 00:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC) |
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 00:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
So continuing my offline conversations, P4 demonstrates how IRV-Prime fails later-no-harm. |
|||
If we change cab voters to cba: |
|||
abc 3N + 2 acb 2N |
|||
bca 3N bac 2N + 1 |
|||
cba 3N cba 2N |
|||
N - 1: |
|||
a: 5N + 2 |
|||
b: 5N + 1 |
|||
c: 5N |
|||
N (aka b vs a): |
|||
b: 10N + 1 |
|||
a: 5N + 2 |
|||
N-Prime (aka b vs c): |
|||
b: 8N + 3 |
|||
c: 8N |
|||
b wins, which means later-no-harm fails. |
|||
Dang it! Thought for sure it satisfied it, but it does not. |
|||
Thanks everyone for the discussion & for helping out! |
|||
--[[User:Marcosb|Marcosb]] ([[User talk:Marcosb|talk]]) 03:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
I've transposed the examples on the page you listed (elections 3-5) [[https://github.com/marcosb/vse-sim/blob/master/methods.py to code]], but not sure what I'm looking for: |
I've transposed the examples on the page you listed (elections 3-5) [[https://github.com/marcosb/vse-sim/blob/master/methods.py to code]], but not sure what I'm looking for: |