Talk:Instant-runoff voting: Difference between revisions
→Fixing the shortcomings of IRV
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 99:
Please consider using an eleven step instant runoff process to make IRV more fair. ▼
I have used Google Sheets to create a demonstrator. I'm old and not an expert in anything. But I'm pretty sure it works. I will be very embarrassed if I've made typos in the formulae and the results don't make sense. Point it out and I'll fix it. Here's a link to my spreadsheet:▼
▲Please consider using an eleven step instant runoff process to make IRV more fair.
▲I have used Google Sheets to create a demonstrator. I'm old and not an expert in anything. But I'm pretty sure it works. I will be very embarrassed if I've made typos in the formulae and the results don't make sense. Point it out and I'll fix it.
--[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 05:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Line 296 ⟶ 295:
== Re: Assessing IRV, the advantages of normal runoff voting over IRV. ==
My suggested improvement to IRV, [[user:RalphInOttawa/Standard Vote]], sort of has that CHANCE FOR APPEAL
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 08:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
|