Talk:Majority: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Wegerje
mNo edit summary
imported>Wegerje
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


:::I think the way you did it in the div box looks good. I was thinking of adding a CSS style for the election model notation, but if you beat me to it, I won't complain. You could just play with putting the election models in div boxes, or use your personal stylesheet: [[User:Wegerje/monobook.css]] to play with it until it's ready to be copied. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 22:04, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
:::I think the way you did it in the div box looks good. I was thinking of adding a CSS style for the election model notation, but if you beat me to it, I won't complain. You could just play with putting the election models in div boxes, or use your personal stylesheet: [[User:Wegerje/monobook.css]] to play with it until it's ready to be copied. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 22:04, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)

:::: I'll need to learn a new skill, eh!


::'''As for criterion/criteria.''' Ok, I looked up "Generalized Condorcet criterion" on google and it appears to be common usage. It struck me strangely, but that's my lack of education. [[User:Wegerje|Wegerje]] 09:29, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
::'''As for criterion/criteria.''' Ok, I looked up "Generalized Condorcet criterion" on google and it appears to be common usage. It struck me strangely, but that's my lack of education. [[User:Wegerje|Wegerje]] 09:29, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
Line 11: Line 13:
:::Aah, I didn't understand that you were talking about criterion vs. criteria. I guess we should set up redirects so that people searching for "criteria' will find it. I'll look at that stuff tomorrow. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 22:04, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)
:::Aah, I didn't understand that you were talking about criterion vs. criteria. I guess we should set up redirects so that people searching for "criteria' will find it. I'll look at that stuff tomorrow. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 22:04, 17 Mar 2005 (PST)


:::'''No not that,''' although that may be an issue in itself. I didn't realize that people actually called something the "Generalized Condorcet ciriterion" or the "Montonicity criterion". I didn't realize that "criterion" was a part of the name and that people used it in common reference. My Bad, as bloggers say.
::::'''No not that,''' although that may be an issue in itself. I didn't realize that people actually called something the "Generalized Condorcet ciriterion" or the "Montonicity criterion". I didn't realize that "criterion" was a part of the name and that people used it in common reference. My Bad, as bloggers say.