Talk:Pairwise counting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 18:45, 17 January 2020

I suggest using this table concept from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Burlington_mayoral_election#Analysis_of_the_2009_election

Pairwise preference combinations:[21][26]

wi JS DS KW BK AM

	AM	Andy

Montroll (5–0)

5 Wins ↓

	BK	Bob

Kiss (4–1)

1 Loss → ↓ 4 Wins

4067 (AM) – 3477 (BK)

	KW	Kurt

Wright (3–2)

2 Losses → 3 Wins ↓

4314 (BK) – 4064 (KW)

4597 (AM) – 3668 (KW)

	DS	Dan

Smith (2–3)

3 Losses → 2 Wins ↓

3975 (KW) – 3793 (DS)

3946 (BK) – 3577 (DS)

4573 (AM) – 2998 (DS)

	JS	James

Simpson (1–4)

4 Losses → 1 Win ↓

5573 (DS) – 721 (JS)

5274 (KW) – 1309 (JS)

5517 (BK) – 845 (JS)

6267 (AM) – 591 (JS)

	wi	Write-in (0–5)	5 Losses →	3338 (JS) –

165 (wi)

6057 (DS) – 117 (wi)

6063 (KW) – 163 (wi)

6149 (BK) – 116 (wi)

6658 (AM) – 104 (wi)

BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 08:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

When the vote-counting method is specified, this alternate format has some advantages for some voters. (Yet other voters will be overwhelmed with TMI (too much information.)) However, this article must remain neutral about how the pairwise counts are used. The above example is not neutral because it specifies win counts, and because the order of candidates is clearly not neutral. If you want to insert a grid with real numbers then the Tennessee example could be used, but the sequence would be the sequence used in the ballots table (not a "winning" sequence). VoteFair (talk) 18:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:50, 17 January 2020 (view source) BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "I suggest using this table concept from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Burlington_mayoral_election#Analysis_of_the_2009_election Pairwise preference combinations:[21][2...")		Revision as of 18:45, 17 January 2020 (view source) VoteFair (talk \| contribs) (Article must remain neutral about how the counts are used.) Newer edit →
Line 79:		Line 79:

	[[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|talk]]) 08:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)		[[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|talk]]) 08:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

			: When the vote-counting method is specified, this alternate format has some advantages for some voters. (Yet other voters will be overwhelmed with TMI (too much information.)) However, this article must remain neutral about how the pairwise counts are used. The above example is not neutral because it specifies win counts, and because the order of candidates is clearly not neutral. If you want to insert a grid with real numbers then the Tennessee example could be used, but the sequence would be the sequence used in the ballots table (not a "winning" sequence). [[User:VoteFair\|VoteFair]] ([[User talk:VoteFair\|talk]]) 18:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)