Talk:Preferential voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:53, 27 February 2020

Ordinal voting is the proper term. We should use this at the page title --Dr. Edmonds (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

If so, preferential voting ought to be a redirect page towards this page. I'd probably also suggest using "rated voting" as a redirect to "cardinal voting". BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

"Preferential voting" is far more common and I'm not sure why it would be any less "proper", so I think it should stay as is. It's essentially a disambig page right now anyway, and maybe should be more concise like Wikipedia's disambig page. — Psephomancy (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:45, 27 February 2020 (view source) BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 19:53, 27 February 2020 (view source) Psephomancy (talk \| contribs) (respond to User:Dr. Edmonds)
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: If so, preferential voting ought to be a redirect page towards this page. I'd probably also suggest using "rated voting" as a redirect to "cardinal voting". [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|talk]]) 17:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)		: If so, preferential voting ought to be a redirect page towards this page. I'd probably also suggest using "rated voting" as a redirect to "cardinal voting". [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|talk]]) 17:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

			"Preferential voting" is far more common and I'm not sure why it would be any less "proper", so I think it should stay as is. It's essentially a disambig page right now anyway, and maybe should be more concise like [[w:Preferential_voting\|Wikipedia's disambig page]]. — [[User:Psephomancy\|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy\|talk]]) 19:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)