Talk:Probability: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 12:
:: I think a solution you might be okay with is to create an "Overlap with other fields" section in the [[Voting theory]] article. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 13:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
''it may genuinely be useful or of interest to document connections between voting and computation, such as how Kemeny-Young's winner can be found by solving a certain kind of optimization problem.''
: Yes, that is of interest, so what's wrong with discussing it in the [[Kemeny-Young]] article, with links to the topics that are mentioned?
''to create an "Overlap with other fields" section in the Voting theory article. ''
: That's fine, I guess? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 03:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
:: I think the statistics article could be a viable place to add this article in as a subsection. But basically, I just want to be able to document the information that sometimes, when evaluating who should win in voting methods, you need to think in terms of probabilities rather than determinism. Maybe it makes sense as a sentence in the voting methods article, if you prefer that. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 04:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
| |||