Talk:STAR voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 21:37, 28 January 2024 (view source) Closed Limelike Curves (talk \| contribs) (→‎Why 5 stars?: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:38, 28 January 2024 (view source) Closed Limelike Curves (talk \| contribs) (→‎Why 5 stars?) Tag: Visual edit Newer edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:
	This might be intentional, though: with something like a 100-point scale, there would be very little difference between being a strategic voter's 1st choice and their 10th choice in the first round, so the coarser scale makes strategic exaggeration harder.		This might be intentional, though: with something like a 100-point scale, there would be very little difference between being a strategic voter's 1st choice and their 10th choice in the first round, so the coarser scale makes strategic exaggeration harder.

	Intuitively, the half-star feels like a reasonable compromise, but other people might disagree on how to balance these criteria. (Some people ~~even~~ prefer ~~approval~~ ~~voting, which limits~~ strategic exaggeration even more!)		Intuitively, the half-star feels like a reasonable compromise, but other people might disagree on how to balance these criteria. (Some people would prefer to limit strategic exaggeration even more with approval voting!)