Talk:Smith,IRV: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20:
:: which is equivalent to taking the T_N (Smith) set candidate closest to being the winner in IRV (i.e. eliminated last, closest to the top of the social ordering). Woodall 'does' use the X,Y notation elsewhere in the paper (e.g. "CNTT,DAC"), but he doesn't define it outright. In particular, it's not obvious if he's referring to what the list members call X,Y or what they call X//Y. Since the draft paper isn't publicly available and the comma notation seems to be ambiguously defined there, I think we can more unambiguously attribute the notation to Benham. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 10:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
:: Smith/IRV is equivalent to Smith//IRV. Whoever wrote the Condorcet Wikipedia page mentions "One possible method is to apply instant-runoff voting to the candidates of the Smith set. This method has been described as 'Smith/IRV'." [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 16:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||