Talk:Uncovered set: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(Banks set) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 7:
That the beatpath originates in X means that X can become champion in a sequential elimination rule. That this beatpath is not the suffix (the end) of some beatpath originating in Y means that Y can't take the win from X by rearranging the order of the remaining candidates, once X has become champion. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 22:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
:: Or differently put, X is in the Banks set if there's a beatpath originating in X with the additional requirement that every candidate in the beatpath beats every candidate after it (not just the candidate immediately after), '''and''' it's impossible to put some other candidate in front of the beatpath while keeping that invariant.<ref name="Miller 2001 p. ">{{cite book | last=Miller | first=Nicholas | title=Committees, agendas and voting | publisher=Routledge | publication-place=Abingdon, Oxon | year=2001 | isbn=1-136-46060-8 | oclc=1082241178 | page=68}}</ref> As far as I understand it, at least; I could, of course, be wrong. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 23:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
| |||