Talk:Vote For and Against: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 23:23, 6 August 2005

Would "vote for and against as many as you like" be a worse idea? This would satisfy FBC and I guess if the version with the 50% rule is used, burying wouldn't be as big an issue as with average ratings (nothing to brag about though). --R.H. 09:54, 5 Aug 2005 (PDT)

With the 50% rule, it wouldn't satisfy FBC. In either version, you'd have the problem of what to do when all candidates are disqualified. Kevin Venzke 10:39, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)

I really meant "vote for as many and against as many as you like" --R.H. 16:23, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)

Revision as of 17:39, 6 August 2005 (view source) imported>KVenzke No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:23, 6 August 2005 (view source) imported>R.H. No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	With the 50% rule, it wouldn't satisfy FBC. In either version, you'd have the problem of what to do when all candidates are disqualified. [[User:KVenzke\|Kevin Venzke]] 10:39, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)		With the 50% rule, it wouldn't satisfy FBC. In either version, you'd have the problem of what to do when all candidates are disqualified. [[User:KVenzke\|Kevin Venzke]] 10:39, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)

			I really meant "vote for as many and against as many as you like" --[[User:R.H.\|R.H.]] 16:23, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)