Talk:Weighted positional method: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Created page with ""It follows that the only Condorcet-compliant sequential runoff method based on a weighted positional method is Baldwin" Nanson's method doesn't count? ~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2:
Nanson's method doesn't count? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 15:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
:By "sequential" I mean that it eliminates one candidate at a time. Nanson eliminates every candidate with a below-average Borda score, and so may take more than one at once. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 15:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||